If that rings a bell it is because we are well on our way down this path with the Norman Hsu fundraising scandal. When the Wall Street Journal first raised the issue of whether there was anything fishy about Hsu - a top Hillary fundraiser or “HillRaiser” - bundling millions of dollars of campaign contributions from donors of seemingly modest means the Clinton campaign initially insisted nothing was wrong. When it was revealed that Hsu was in fact a fugitive from justice having defrauded millions of dollars from investors and then failed to show up for his court appearance Hillary expressed shock and described it as a breakdown in the donor vetting process. Following Hsu’s lawyer’s lead, Hillary and other beneficiaries of his money insisted that this was simply a misunderstanding from the past that would soon be cleared up. This despite the fact that Hsu’s past was extremely vague and it wasn’t clear exactly where he acquired the millions of dollars he had been funneling to Democrats like Hillary since 2004. His campaign finance reports were full of old addresses and mysterious and now defunct companies. They initially refused to return Hsu’s donations, but soon relented and announced they would donate his contributions to charity but keep the bundled funds. Hsu turned himself in, posted bail, and agreed to give up his passport. The Clinton campaign was ready to put the story behind them. But as with so many other Clinton scandals, things got more complicated. Hsu once again decided to skip his court date and run for it. He never returned his passport as promised, forfeited his $2 million cash bail, and is now in police custody. | 
