Random Liberal Quotes...
"I would think that if you understood what Communism was, you would hope, you would pray on your knees, that we would someday become communists." --Jane Fonda
The Present: Bringing Up Hillary's Past
|
|
|
hillarynews
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2255
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:00 am Post subject: The Present: Bringing Up Hillary's Past |
 |
|
|
 The Present: Bringing Up Hillary's Past
By: Bob ParksWhen people think they can get away with things, they keep on doing them. That's why when a burgler is caught, it's never assumed that the crime he or she was busted for was their first. They've usually been at it for awhile, but weren't caught until now.
Category: Commentary
By: Bob ParksWhen people think they can get away with things, they keep on doing them. That's why when a burgler is caught, it's never assumed that the crime he or she was busted for was their first. They've usually been at it for awhile, but weren't caught until now.Maybe that's why Hillary Clinton and all the campaign "irregularities" reoccur to this day. She (and Bill) got away with so much before, they must truly believe they're untouchable.It's up to us to make sure Mrs. Clinton doesn't get yet another pass. If that means "hitting the girl", so be it….NYC Chinatown Donorgate Under-CoveredBy Lee Cary, NY SunPublished 11/2/2007To date, here's how major newspapers have covered the NYC Chinatown Donorgate story:October 19: The Los Angeles Times reported that the Clinton campaign received $380,000 from poor Chinese living in largely ethnic New York City neighborhoods — one is heavily populated by "recent immigrants from Fujian Province." One-third of 150 donors could not be located; many gave false addresses. Other donors found and interviewed gave varying motives for their contributions. "Many said they gave to Clinton because they were instructed to do so by local association leaders." Some cited an interest in immigration issues. One donor was proud to have had his picture taken with Mrs. Clinton — he sent it home to China.October 20: New York Times reporter Patrick Healy, in "Clinton Returned $7,000, Campaign Said," wrote that the campaign staff had "identified the concerns about the Chinatown fund-raising on its own," and had already returned seven separate $1,000 donations. (Really, to whom? Those the L.A. Times couldn't find? And only seven?) Healy quoted campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson — "Asian-Americans in Chinatown and Flushing have the same right to contribute as every other American." (Who said they didn't?)October 22: The message of the Washington Post's editorial, "Dishwashers for Clinton," is reflected in its subtitle — "Once again, a zeal for campaign cash trumps common sense." It's just another instance, as with Norman Hsu, of carelessness born of zeal. The Post states that, "In the case of seven $1,000 contributions, donors did not respond, and their checks were returned, according to the campaign." (How do you return checks to those who don't respond?) The Post repeated Wolfson's statement and recommended the campaign tighten its vetting process. (Tighten again?)And that's it…so far.
Read more...
Source: The Hillary Project
Description: reporting the news about Hillary that the media refuses to |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Add this topic to your bookmarks
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
