Random Liberal Quotes...
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003
So, Empress Inevitable Hillary Clinton Has No Clothes
|
|
|
hillarynews
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 2255
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:00 am Post subject: So, Empress Inevitable Hillary Clinton Has No Clothes |
 |
|
|
 So, Empress Inevitable Hillary Clinton Has No Clothes
By David Karki In the space of just a couple minutes in last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Senator Hillary Clinton showed everything that is wrong with her candidacy and why Americans would be wise to prevent her from a second stint in the White House.
Category: Commentary
By David Karki In the space of just a couple minutes in last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Senator Hillary Clinton showed everything that is wrong with her candidacy and why Americans would be wise to prevent her from a second stint in the White House.Tim Russert asked her whether she supports New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's plan to issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants - a perfectly valid question as she also represents that state. Hillary, using that old Clinton strategy upon which Bill made their career so far, came to the fork in the road - and took it. She answered that she thought it was a bad idea, but that didn't mean New York shouldn't do it. At least, that's as close a guess as I can make, given how thoroughly she simultaneously took both sides of the issue while trying not to take either side at all. I guess that's what one does when polls show even 72 percent of New York Democrats oppose it, while your primary opponents and far-left interest groups whose campaign cash you need are all for it.Russert also asked about the failure to release documents and e-mails from the first Clinton Administration from the National Archives, something typically done at a regular time interval after the end of a term. This is a pertinent question, as we are being asked to put these same people back in power. If they won't be open regarding the last time around - while hypocritically accusing the Bush Administration of being hyper-secretive - why should we expect them to be so the next? And then there's former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger's stealing of documents from the National Archives by stuffing them in his pants and socks - the major scandal a liberally-biased media quickly and quietly buried - something they never would have done if, say, Condoleezza Rice had done the same. Just what was in those documents such that Berger was willing to take such a silly risk? And was the motive that those documents were going to be declassified and released with the rest?
Read more...
Source: The Hillary Project
Description: reporting the news about Hillary that the media refuses to |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Add this topic to your bookmarks
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
